DEVIL’S ADVOCATE PART 1: WHY I LIKE ‘VAN HAGAR’ BETTER THAN VAN HALEN

Despite the fact that the Van Halen brothers are all peachy with David Lee Roth again, have a highly successful reunion tour under their belts and Eddie swears up and down that a new album is in their future, I have a strange feeling we’ll have a new president in office before we get a new VH album on the shelves.  Therefore, the only thing we VH loyalists have left to do (besides stand here holding our dicks, of course) is to reminisce about the times Van Halen was, y’know, active.

Now it’s no secret that despite the band selling a FUCKTON of records with Sammy Hagar, most Van Halen fans probably prefer the original era, when David Lee Roth was fronting the band. Some fans even insist that the only true “Van Halen” was with DLR, and so the name “Van Hagar” was coined to separate the two. Perhaps it’s the fact that my first true exposure to VH was in ’96 (when Sammy was still technically in the band), but despite loving all of Van Halen’s stuff (yeah, even a couple of songs from Van Halen III), I’ve always gravitated more towards the Sammy era.

Three reasons why, after the  jump…

  1. Sammy was the better singer. Not the better frontman, mind you (who could be a better frontman than Diamond Dave?) but on a strictly technical level, Sammy was the better singer, with a much bigger vocal range.
  2. The band was more versatile with Sammy. Musically and lyrically. As great as VH with David Lee Roth were, they were also a bit one-dimensional. A song like “Right Now”, for instance, wouldn’t have been possible in the DLR era (and if you don’t like “Right Now”, you can go right on and fuck yourself) and although they didn’t sound quite as good in comparison, the band was still able to cover a lot of the DLR-era songs with Sammy in concert. That could never happen the other way around, now that Dave’s back in the fold.
  3. The band rocked harder with Sammy. “Get the fuck outta here”, one might say, and cite the numerous borderline-sappy power ballads that Van Hagar produced. But songs like “Poundcake”, “Judgment Day” and a lot of the stuff from the album Balance are heavier than anything they’ve done with David Lee Roth, while “Humans Being” (from the Twister soundtrack, and the song that really got me into the band) is a straight up headbanger.
About these ads

3 Responses to “DEVIL’S ADVOCATE PART 1: WHY I LIKE ‘VAN HAGAR’ BETTER THAN VAN HALEN”

  1. benjamin Says:

    hell yea. the brothers can kiss my RED rocker *ss because lets face it they needed SAMMY way more than Sammy needed them and lets see VAN HAGAR is a better band than dave who?

    wheres my cabo wabo and rock on to the new band chickenfoot

  2. [...] fan these past 14 years (and I actually liked parts of Van Halen 3). I’ve already shared my thoughts on who I feel is the group’s best singer in the long run, as well as my opinion of Eddie Van [...]

  3. 齿轮泵…

    [...]DEVIL’S ADVOCATE PART 1: WHY I LIKE ‘VAN HAGAR’ BETTER THAN VAN HALEN « TwistedCritic[...]…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: